.sidebar-container, .sidebar, .rsidebar.sidewrap { display: none !important; /* Hide Contempo Sidebar */ .sidebar-container { display: none !important; } /* Expand Main Content to Full Width */ .main-container, .main-inner, .main-inner .columns { width: 100% !important; max-width: 100% !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; } /* Fix for individual post wrappers if needed */ .content-inner { margin-right: 0 !important; margin-left: 0 !important; }

Friday, May 27, 2005

The ethical case for animal research / spiked-online, 25 May 2005

http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CAB67.htm
Helene Guldberg
"So how could the two-year investigation from the Nuffield Council end up with the goal of the reduction of the use of animals in research? It elevated the importance of the 'Three R's': the refinement, reduction and replacement of animals in research."

Report - http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/RIA_Report_FINAL-opt.pdf
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)