.sidebar-container, .sidebar, .rsidebar.sidewrap { display: none !important; /* Hide Contempo Sidebar */ .sidebar-container { display: none !important; } /* Expand Main Content to Full Width */ .main-container, .main-inner, .main-inner .columns { width: 100% !important; max-width: 100% !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; } /* Fix for individual post wrappers if needed */ .content-inner { margin-right: 0 !important; margin-left: 0 !important; }

Friday, November 05, 2004

Indymedia server grab - Home Office knew, but isn't telling | The Register, 4 Nov 2004

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/04/indymedia_flint_nondenial/
Home Office
John Lettice
"Almost a month after Indymedia servers in London were seized by agencies unknown working for states unknown, a parliamentary answer suggests that the Home Office does know who seized them, and under what authority. But it's not telling.
The Home Office has been subjected to a steady drizzle of questions on the subject of Indymedia, but these have generally been answered with a denial of any involvement on the part of the agency the question refers to, followed by Caroline Flint's catchphrase: 'In the circumstances I do not therefore believe that it is necessary for me to make a statement.' Yesterday however John McDonnell MP scored a hit of sorts by bowling a question in fairly broad terms: 'To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on what (a) grounds and (b) legal authority the web servers of the news agency Indymedia were seized on 7 October.'"

No comments: