.sidebar-container, .sidebar, .rsidebar.sidewrap { display: none !important; /* Hide Contempo Sidebar */ .sidebar-container { display: none !important; } /* Expand Main Content to Full Width */ .main-container, .main-inner, .main-inner .columns { width: 100% !important; max-width: 100% !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; } /* Fix for individual post wrappers if needed */ .content-inner { margin-right: 0 !important; margin-left: 0 !important; }

Saturday, April 22, 2006

Agony of 'not proven' verdict / The Herald, 21 Apr 2006

http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/60505.html
JENNIFER CUNNINGHAMApril 21 2006
When Charles Clarke, the home secretary, yesterday announced a review to consider giving the Court of Appeal in England the power to deliver a 'not proven' verdict, he set the cat among the pigeons. The proposal would be part of a package of measures to reduce the cost of compensation to people wrongly convicted of crime, but it was the use of the phrase 'not proven' which produced a sharp intake of breath on all sides."
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)