.sidebar-container, .sidebar, .rsidebar.sidewrap { display: none !important; /* Hide Contempo Sidebar */ .sidebar-container { display: none !important; } /* Expand Main Content to Full Width */ .main-container, .main-inner, .main-inner .columns { width: 100% !important; max-width: 100% !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; } /* Fix for individual post wrappers if needed */ .content-inner { margin-right: 0 !important; margin-left: 0 !important; }

Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Aggravated Sentencing: Blakely v. Washington / [USA] Vera Publications, Sep 2004

http://www.vera.org/publication_pdf/250_477.pdf?bulletin=33&token=1262
Jon Wool
"Few Supreme Court decisions have engendered as much uncertainty in state and federal courts as Blakely v. Washington. This report, the second in a series on the practical implications of the ruling, examines the legal issues raised by Blakely and prior related decisions. The Court ruled in June that any factor that increases a criminal sentence above an established threshold must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt (or admitted by the defendant) and cannot be imposed by a judge alone. The ruling cast doubt on two decades of sentencing reform efforts."

No comments: