.sidebar-container, .sidebar, .rsidebar.sidewrap { display: none !important; /* Hide Contempo Sidebar */ .sidebar-container { display: none !important; } /* Expand Main Content to Full Width */ .main-container, .main-inner, .main-inner .columns { width: 100% !important; max-width: 100% !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; } /* Fix for individual post wrappers if needed */ .content-inner { margin-right: 0 !important; margin-left: 0 !important; }

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Officers to ignore burglar alarms, save about $600,000 a year / ~~~San Francisco Chronicle, 21 Jan 2005

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/01/21/BAG74AU3GU1.DTL
Henry K Lee
"Under the policy, police won't respond to burglar alarms unless a resident, property owner or alarm company employee can show evidence that a crime occurred, such as glass breakage or seeing a suspicious person. Officers, however, will still respond to panic, duress and robbery alarms. "

No comments: